A monkey's uncle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

A monkeys uncle - Essay ExampleJohn Scopes a school teacher from Tennessee was indicted in violation of impartiality by teaching a evolution theory in the public school. The case promised to be an unprecedented show due to the controversial topic and event of eminent participants. Local town leaders could not but use the publicity in order to help their small town. Jennings Bryan considering the evolution theory incredible worried about the erosion of the young peoples moral health. According to his logic the evolution theory and the low percentage of the believers among youth presented a real threat to the future of the society. Having received the strong support from the worried parents he decided to fight teaching Darwinism at schools. In early 1925 his governmental campaign resulted in a legislative changes, known as the Butler Act which prohibited the denial of the Biblical account of mans foundation and teaching of the evolution theory in the public schools of Tennessee.1 So it was no surprise when Bryan received a request to join the prosecution team in the Dayton trial on behalf of the Worlds Christian Fundamentals Association and local prosecutor Sue Hicks (Linder, William Jennings Bryan). In contrast Clarence Darrow, as a modernist, had antonym views on the religion vs. science issue. He was convinced that sacred fundamentalism threatened the entire system of public education by doubting the skepticism of interrogation that moved the progress (Linder, Clarence Darrow). When Darrow found out that Bryans was going to lead the prosecution team, he decided to volunteer to challenge Bryans program and him personally. In spite of the reluctant attitude of the American Civil Liberties Union leadership, the defendant John Scopes insisted on the Darrows participation as a defender. Though the case resembled with the interminable struggle of the opposite good and evil, it still was a prosecutor and defender matter which strategy was rigidly prepared b y both sides. The Prosecution concentrate on two things the prove of the actual violation of the Butler?s Act by John Scopes and influence on the public and jury by using the religious rhetoric and socializing with the local population. The defense in its turn made a stake on the repealing the indictment on the show and federal constitutional levels seeking the declaration in higher instance of that the prohibiting evolution theory in public schools was unconstitutional. Here should be made a short remark over the constitutional grounds of the issue. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment guaranties the protection of the of the US citizens from the using public fund or establishments to respect any particular religious tradition over another, or non-religion over the religion, or religion over non-religion. Hence, teaching of evolution as a scientific theory does not contradict to the First Amendment. Today the controversy between evolution and creationism remains as an important question in the American society. The condition of teaching these topics is under constant debate in legal, religious and political circles. While some religions do not reject the evolution theory some(prenominal) fundamentalist branches of Christianity zealously resist its teaching. However, after normally it is taught in the science courses. Teaching of creationism and intelligent design as science due to its obvious religious background were declared unconstitutional. The core of the current debate lies in the different views on whether evolution/intelligent design